Announcement

Collapse

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

Compression Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rusdude
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    I'm not sure what's going to happen to in-store rentals, but even Netflix admitted to having to raise prices for Blu-Ray disks (don't think they've said how much, though).

    Secondly, while I'm not exactly sure why VUDU charges $1 for some HD rentals compared to ATV, there's a simple reason why VOD services charge more -- bandwidth costs. While to us, the costs are 0 (if we are on unlimited plans, lol), service providers have to pay for extra bandwidth used by HD files.

    Leave a comment:


  • HeadHodge
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by aaronwt View Post
    FIOS HD VOD is $3.99 to $5.99 like VUDU, Xbox is up to $6 if you pay full price for 1600 points although I usually pay $10 to $14 for 1600 points, but most people pay $20.
    On the PS3 I've seen up to $5.99
    On Comcast(at my Brothers) I've seen HD VOD up to $5.99

    And of course VUDU is $3.99 to $5.99
    I have no idea about AppleTV sinc eI don't have it and I don't know anyone that has it.

    It sounds like ATV is the odd one with other providers being in line with each other. At least the five I have sampled.
    DirectTv (that phasgorsmic service I mention occasionally) $4.99.

    Leave a comment:


  • jleavens
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by Riekl View Post
    Look I'm not griping for the sake of griping this is a heavily competitive market and I am just saying I am very disapointed in Vudu's VERY slow growth in HD
    I think we all have been disappointed in this area. But it sounds like there is a renewed effort in the company solve the problem and get titles popping.

    Leave a comment:


  • aaronwt
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    FIOS HD VOD is $3.99 to $5.99 like VUDU, Xbox is up to $6 if you pay full price for 1600 points although I usually pay $10 to $14 for 1600 points, but most people pay $20.
    On the PS3 I've seen up to $5.99
    On Comcast(at my Brothers) I've seen HD VOD up to $5.99

    And of course VUDU is $3.99 to $5.99
    I have no idea about AppleTV sinc eI don't have it and I don't know anyone that has it.

    It sounds like ATV is the odd one with other providers being in line with each other. At least the five I have sampled.

    Originally posted by Riekl View Post
    Really ? Where else are HD rentals $5.99? Not on AppleTV .. not on Xbox.

    Look I'm not griping for the sake of griping this is a heavily competitive market and I am just saying I am very disapointed in Vudu's VERY slow growth in HD (you can say what you want about future growth, I bought the Vudu in March because it had more then Apple and all things being equal should have stayed that way, over the last six months the situations are reversed. Apple has more and is growing faster.) Sorry but the only real advantage Vudu had going for it was its huge content lead which seems to have been allowed to flaunder as the competitors catch up. Apple has a better, sleaker interface, easier to find what you want, and costs less. Pricing on Vudu needs to be the same, not a penny more for the content.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riekl
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by aaronwt View Post
    VUDU prices are inline with all the other VOD providers. I have four HD VOD choices, including VUDU and the prices are usually the same or very close.
    Really ? Where else are HD rentals $5.99? Not on AppleTV .. not on Xbox.

    Look I'm not griping for the sake of griping this is a heavily competitive market and I am just saying I am very disapointed in Vudu's VERY slow growth in HD (you can say what you want about future growth, I bought the Vudu in March because it had more then Apple and all things being equal should have stayed that way, over the last six months the situations are reversed. Apple has more and is growing faster.) Sorry but the only real advantage Vudu had going for it was its huge content lead which seems to have been allowed to flaunder as the competitors catch up. Apple has a better, sleaker interface, easier to find what you want, and costs less. Pricing on Vudu needs to be the same, not a penny more for the content.

    Leave a comment:


  • aaronwt
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    VUDU prices are inline with all the other VOD providers. I have four HD VOD choices, including VUDU and the prices are usually the same or very close.
    Originally posted by Riekl View Post
    The point for me, and I think a lot of people isn't the quality issue, it is the price issue. $5.99 is a LOT of money for a one time rental.

    Physical media charges the same to rent HD as they do SD, it costs no more to get blu ray from blockbuster or netflix as to get a normal dvd. Why the huge premium for online ? Even apple has a premium but at least it is a more moderate one, $2extra is significant and too much. $4.99 is really borderline too much for a rental HD or not but at least it is a competitive price.

    Given that Vudu has far less HD content (compared to ATV) and is falling further behind every day, is this ever going to change ? I bought my Vudu back in April because my ATV didn't have enough movies. Over the past 5 months that has really changed, Vudu still has more but Apple is catching up every day, and already has far more HD and TV.

    Vudu had the lead in both SD and HD, where is the big push to get this back?

    Leave a comment:


  • NA9D
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    People pay $2.00 for a cup of Starbucks. If the you want that HD movie, just get one less venti coffee of the day this week! :-)

    I remember when it cost $6.00 to rent VHS!

    I wish the price of everything was lower. But it's not. You want a premium product, you need to pay a premium price.

    And Vudu is not standing still either...

    Leave a comment:


  • Nded
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by Riekl View Post
    .....snip...Vudu had the lead in both SD and HD, where is the big push to get this back?
    There are several articles talking about the Vudu HD catalog very quickly exceeding 1000HD titles. This is going to happen, and I think this will happen very soon, but I don't have any insider knowledge as to when.

    Don't forget that the Vudu also gives you better output compared to the other guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • RonV
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Riekl,

    HD rentals are priced 3.99, 4.99, and 5.99 depending on title plus they are instantly delivered. If you want to go to blockbuster and pick up a DVD to watch in HD just because the price is the same that is fine except that you have to use your time and gas which is a bit costly these days. Or you can wait till Netflix determines that your next in line for the BlueRay version of the movie from your list.

    Yes convenience is what VUDU promised and does deliver and I look at the catalog as providing some of the best movies that are out there at a reasonable cost.

    From what I know that Apple doesn't even publish the number of movies in their catalog and that a 3rd party on runs a site listing the titles. VUDU opening displays the number of titles available on the VUDU box when you search. I have also seen in the last few weeks a lot more HD in the catalog, so it is growing.

    There is always going to be compeition in the VOD market. And even VUDU is not the same box it was 5 months ago with the software upgrades they have put into place and the more flexable rental terms and promotions such at 99 cent rentals.

    Thanks for the post....

    Originally posted by Riekl View Post
    The point for me, and I think a lot of people isn't the quality issue, it is the price issue. $5.99 is a LOT of money for a one time rental.

    Physical media charges the same to rent HD as they do SD, it costs no more to get blu ray from blockbuster or netflix as to get a normal dvd. Why the huge premium for online ? Even apple has a premium but at least it is a more moderate one, $2extra is significant and too much. $4.99 is really borderline too much for a rental HD or not but at least it is a competitive price.

    Given that Vudu has far less HD content (compared to ATV) and is falling further behind every day, is this ever going to change ? I bought my Vudu back in April because my ATV didn't have enough movies. Over the past 5 months that has really changed, Vudu still has more but Apple is catching up every day, and already has far more HD and TV.

    Vudu had the lead in both SD and HD, where is the big push to get this back?

    Leave a comment:


  • Riekl
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    The point for me, and I think a lot of people isn't the quality issue, it is the price issue. $5.99 is a LOT of money for a one time rental.

    Physical media charges the same to rent HD as they do SD, it costs no more to get blu ray from blockbuster or netflix as to get a normal dvd. Why the huge premium for online ? Even apple has a premium but at least it is a more moderate one, $2extra is significant and too much. $4.99 is really borderline too much for a rental HD or not but at least it is a competitive price.

    Given that Vudu has far less HD content (compared to ATV) and is falling further behind every day, is this ever going to change ? I bought my Vudu back in April because my ATV didn't have enough movies. Over the past 5 months that has really changed, Vudu still has more but Apple is catching up every day, and already has far more HD and TV.

    Vudu had the lead in both SD and HD, where is the big push to get this back?

    Leave a comment:


  • aaronwt
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by radguy View Post
    Way back I stated the issues with Vudu HD titles, they never compare to real HD forget about Blue Ray. Anyhoo, check this out, this may clear it up once and for all:

    http://gizmodo.com/5048025/giz-expla...-very-high-def

    As I stated, I like VUDU, however their HD is not really that good, neither is Apple's by the way, compared to actual HD, but they do look great on my projector. If they were say, $4 a pop I might be more willing.
    Not that mis-informed article with that crappy incorrect comparison again. I compared VUDU to Xboxlive and the HD DVD with Transformers and I had much more detail from the VUDU title than the person from Gizmodo. They didn't even have any idea what resolution they were using from the VUDU box. Of course the HD DVD was best, but the VUDU quality was much better than the article implies since apparently they didn't have theirs setup right. I compared a scene with text and the extra detail from the VUDU encode was obvious since you could easily read the text. And then the VUDU encode didn't have all the macroblocking that the Xbox Live encode surprisingly had.
    Of course all the VUDU 1080P24 encodes aren't as good as Transformers but it is one of the better ones. It's just the gizmodo article gives alot of misinformation since their setup wasn't correct and/or the person didn't know how to set it up properly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rusdude
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Nothing is going to come close to a good Blu-Ray encode. However, if encoded properly, HD videos from VUDU/Apple/Xbox/PS3/etc. could look better than an MPEG2 DVD.

    Each GB of bandwidth costs the provider money (I've seen a few dollars mentioned as a cost for an HD flick), so they have to balance the quality with costs of bandwidth and download time. VUDU, though, has a better distribution model (p2p) so they could conceivably offer higher quality downloads at same prices (I talked about that while back).

    Leave a comment:


  • radguy
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Way back I stated the issues with Vudu HD titles, they never compare to real HD forget about Blue Ray. Anyhoo, check this out, this may clear it up once and for all:

    http://gizmodo.com/5048025/giz-expla...-very-high-def

    As I stated, I like VUDU, however their HD is not really that good, neither is Apple's by the way, compared to actual HD, but they do look great on my projector. If they were say, $4 a pop I might be more willing.

    Leave a comment:


  • NA9D
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by aaronwt View Post
    It's 1920x1080 or did I miss something and the VUDU resolution is 1920x1280?
    HD resolutions in general are defined as 1280 x 720 and above. So 1920 x 1080 is HD and yes, Vudu HD resolutions are 1920 x 1080.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swampfox
    replied
    Re: Compression Discussion

    Originally posted by aaronwt View Post
    It's 1920x1080 or did I miss something and the VUDU resolution is 1920x1280?
    Sorry, it's a typo

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X