Announcement

Collapse

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

High price of HD rentals

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Re: High price of HD rentals

    Originally posted by NA9D View Post
    I never stated that 1080p was not indicative of quality. It absolutely is. A 1280x720 picture has 921,600 pixels. A 1960x1080 image has 2,116,800 pixels or over 2 times the number of pixels as the 720p image.
    Now that I can get 1080/24p instead of just 1080i from Directv, I would have to say that everyting I'm watching on Directv is on average at least 2000% better than yesterday!!

    Comment


      #47
      Re: High price of HD rentals

      Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
      Now that I can get 1080/24p instead of just 1080i from Directv, I would have to say that everyting I'm watching on Directv is on average at least 2000% better than yesterday!!
      If you wanted to be accurate, you'd say it's 129.6875% better.

      With dual disabilities (noun-challenged and math-challenged) we should be able to get some sort of federal grant set aside for your circumstances.

      Comment


        #48
        Re: High price of HD rentals

        Originally posted by Nded View Post
        If you wanted to be accurate, you'd say it's 129.6875% better.

        With dual disabilities (noun-challenged and math-challenged) we should be able to get some sort of federal grant set aside for your circumstances.
        Well Brain, how the heck do you think I will pay for 3lbs of Cheese??

        Remember, in noun class they teach us that, Noun is just a four letter word!!

        Comment


          #49
          Re: High price of HD rentals

          [quote=Nded;23911]If you wanted to be accurate, you'd say it's 129.6875% better.
          quote]

          You're not factoring in the fact that PQ is in the eye of the beholder!!!


          Comment


            #50
            Re: High price of HD rentals

            Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
            Well Brain, how the heck do you think I will pay for 3lbs of Cheese??

            Remember, in noun class they teach us that, Noun is just a four letter word!!
            For the record, that was your 999th post on this forum. The next post is your 1,000th, so you should take your time to really contemplate the content and make it memorable.

            Comment


              #51
              Re: High price of HD rentals

              Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
              Originally posted by Nded View Post
              If you wanted to be accurate, you'd say it's 129.6875% better.
              You're not factoring in the fact that PQ is in the eye of the beholder!!!


              #1000 - enough said

              Comment


                #52
                Re: High price of HD rentals

                Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
                Well Brain, how the heck do you think I will pay for 3lbs of Cheese??

                Remember, in noun class they teach us that, Noun is just a four letter word!!
                Hey, even my six-year old knows:

                A noun's a special kind of word,
                It's any name you ever heard,
                I find it quite interesting.
                A noun's a person, place, or thing.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Re: High price of HD rentals

                  Originally posted by Nded View Post
                  For the record, that was your 999th post on this forum. The next post is your 1,000th, so you should take your time to really contemplate the content and make it memorable.
                  I did and it got bleeped by JohnA.

                  I just don't understand what's so offensive about displaying a picture of a little ole IPOD. I guess displaying competitive techno company products are verboten.

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Re: High price of HD rentals

                    Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
                    I did and it got bleeped by JohnA.

                    I just don't understand what's so offensive about displaying a picture of a little ole IPOD. I guess displaying competitive techno company products are verboten.
                    Well it was the item that was underneath the iPod that needed to be bleeped.
                    Vudu Forum Moderator

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Re: High price of HD rentals

                      Originally posted by JohnA View Post
                      Well it was the item that was underneath the iPod that needed to be bleeped.
                      Oh!! I guess I had the wrong skin setting for the iPod.

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Re: High price of HD rentals

                        Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
                        Oh!! I guess I had the wrong skin setting for the iPod.
                        We'll just leave it at that!
                        Vudu Forum Moderator

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Re: High price of HD rentals

                          I found this sorta interesting:

                          In terms of being able to display 1080/24p directly on a TV set, the feature is of "no use" to certainly more than 95% of subscribers. After all, TV sets with this capability are mostly "new for 2008" ? and, generally, only the premium models from each manufacturer have this feature.

                          But ... the 1080/24p feature has OTHER redeeming qualities, so it is NOT "useless" at all. In fact, the main reason for adding this feature was surely the fact that it reduces the download time for movies in "Video On Demand" by around 20%. Do the math, and you will find that the bandwidth of 1080/24p is actually 20% LESS than the bandwidth of 1080/60i.

                          (And 1080/60p is TWICE the bandwidth of 1080/60i, which makes 1080/60p all but useless as a transfer medium. Not to mention the fact that there is no native material in 1080/60p anyway, since movie-originated material is 24p and video-originated material is 60i.)

                          As I mentioned in another thread, 1080/24p is not really new as a recording medium, since HR20 receivers have ALWAYS had that capability ? it is a REQUIREMENT of the terrestrial ATSC standard (for recording OTA broadcasts). Not that any broadcaster has ever actually USED that format (it is one of 18 formats mandated by the ATSC standard, even though only 4 of those formats have ever actually been used for other-than-experimental broadcasting).

                          For more details on this, and some reflection on what 1080/24p really "means to you", see my other post at:

                          1080/24p and the Normal User

                          William C. McCain
                          Palo Alto, California
                          __________________

                          Comment


                            #58
                            Re: High price of HD rentals

                            And actually, 1080p/24 requires less bandwidth than 720p/60!

                            Let's assume that each pixel is 1 bit (BAD assumption but the math scales since all pixels are going to be the same number of bits regardless of resolution format).

                            Therefore, for a 720p picture it takes 921,600 bits = 921.6 Kbits per frame.

                            921.6 Kb/frame * 60 Frames/second = 55.296 Mb/sec

                            For a 1080p picture we get: 2.1168 Mbits per frame (see where this is going?)

                            2.1168 Mb/frame * 24 Frames/second = 50.8032 Mb/sec

                            So, a 1080p/24 pic takes less bandwidth than a 720p/60 pic! This is one of the things we were pointing out about how the Vudu has a superior HD image with less bandwidth than AppleTV.

                            Now, I didn't ever think of 1080p/24 being a broadcastable format, but it does make sense that it certainly could be broadcast inside a standard ATSC 6 MHz channel. Problem is that most TVs and most TV equipment is set up for the 60 frames a second bit (or 30 interlaced frames which is still 60 frames).

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Re: High price of HD rentals

                              Originally posted by HeadHodge View Post
                              William C. McCain
                              Palo Alto, California
                              __________________
                              So, I didn't realize this was your name. You trying to claim to be a relative of John McCain so that after he's elected you can get special perks?

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Re: High price of HD rentals

                                Originally posted by NA9D View Post
                                So, I didn't realize this was your name. You trying to claim to be a relative of John McCain so that after he's elected you can get special perks?
                                I only hang with the best!!! They offer the best Quid Pro Quo!!

                                If my measley understanding of this format stuff is correct, I believe that even though VUDU is sent 1080/24p, for TVs that display it, the extra pull down frames are added by the box to display 1080i, etc.

                                If that's true, do you see a reason why the industry couldn't standardize on 1080/24p and the TV mfgs either conform to it or does like the VUDU box does and fill in the empty frames to properly sync the picture??

                                Also I have no need for one, but there is a box you can get to display digital broadcast on a legacy TV. Couldn't this box be made to also process a 1080/24p format as well??

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X