Announcement

Collapse

Fandango Forum Guidelines

Fandango Forum Guidelines

The Fandango are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango experience. Here, Fandango customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango Streaming and Fandango Streaming related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango Streaming service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango products and services should be directed to Fandango customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.

Fandango will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango products and services should be directed to Fandango customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 34
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 19 34 template Next
  • Todd.Sutton
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING shifts from its correct aspect ratio of 2.35 : 1 to 1:78:1 after the opening credits.

    Leave a comment:

  • RoyBatty
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Land of the Pharaohs (1955) is cropped from 2.55:1 to 1.78:1 with persistent green digital artifacts around the edge of the picture.

    Leave a comment:

  • Todd.Sutton
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    The Getaway (1972) switches from 2.35:1 to 1.78:1 following the opening credits.

    Leave a comment:

  • Capt-Cupcake
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by mrewster View Post
    It's been gone since early-mid December...
    I'm going to have to check my TV when I get home. I sent an e-mail at the time they first stopped offering HD as a purchase option explaining that HD (not HDX) was the only way to watch those Universal Horror films in HD in the proper aspect ratio seeing as the HDX was messed up. They replied and assured me that the option to view HD would not go away.

    Leave a comment:

  • mrewster
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by Capt-Cupcake View Post
    As of a few months ago, you could still switch to regular HD on a tv even though it's not "advertised"
    It's been gone since early-mid December...

    Leave a comment:

  • Capt-Cupcake
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by mrewster View Post
    There is no HD without the X anymore.
    As of a few months ago, you could still switch to regular HD on a tv even though it's not "advertised"

    Leave a comment:

  • Capt-Cupcake
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by SirStephenH View Post
    It's not just movies.

    Babylon 5 [OAR: 16/9 (1.78:1) Vudu: 4/3 (1.33:1)]

    Eh...this one is tricky. YES, B5 was indeed shot in 16:9, but that is NOT the original Aspect ratio. JMS shot the show in 16x9 to 'future proof' the show, but it was originally aired in 4:3 and it was shot accordingly. JMS knew it was to air in 4:3, and just kind of "shot extra" so that it could be shown in 16:9 someday. The DVDs are all in 4:3, too. 4:3 really is the original aspect ratio.

    EDIT:

    I am mistaken: The DVDs are indeed in 16x9, but that is problematic. Honestly, the show is better in 4:3 as that was the original aspect ratio. See below:

    I know that there are a lot of Babylon 5 fans who are going to be very disappointed by the information in this section. Babylon 5 has been released in a 1.85:1 widescreen aspect ratio, anamorphically enhanced; this was the original aspect ratio that Straczynski used when filming the live action sequences.

    The computer-generated (CGI) footage is highly problematic, and for a very simple reason. While the live action footage was originally filmed in a widescreen aspect ratio, the CGI shots were rendered directly for the 4:3 aspect ratio. Instead of re-rendering the CGI footage for the new aspect ratio, Warner chose to crop and zoom in to the existing 4:3 CGI image. The result is that any scene with CGI in it looks distinctly blockier and less detailed than equivalent live-action footage: more like VHS than anything I'd expect on DVD. In addition, all the CGI scenes show major aliasing artifacts (a very noticeable shimmering effect) because of the mismatch between the rendered computer graphics and the screen's resolution. These artifacts could have been avoided by re-rendering the CGI shots for the new aspect ratio, or if the initial image had been rendered at a higher resolution to begin with. Unfortunately, Babylon 5 makes extensive use of CGI throughout both exterior and interior shots, so the lower image quality of this footage is very noticeable.

    Leave a comment:

  • mrewster
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by Capt-Cupcake View Post
    I don't know about Sabotuer, but Mummy, Invisible Man and the other Universal films that were stretched in HDX are all correct in HD without the X.
    There is no HD without the X anymore.

    Leave a comment:

  • Capt-Cupcake
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by mok77 View Post
    The Invisible Man (1933) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1, correct AR in SD)
    The Mummy (1932) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1, correct AR in SD)
    Sabotuer (1942) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1)
    I don't know about Sabotuer, but Mummy, Invisible Man and the other Universal films that were stretched in HDX are all correct in HD without the X.

    Leave a comment:

  • dunnvudu
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Escape from L.A. has been fixed and now has the correct O.A.R.

    Leave a comment:

  • SirStephenH
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    It's not just movies.

    Babylon 5 [OAR: 16/9 (1.78:1) Vudu: 4/3 (1.33:1)]

    Leave a comment:

  • SirStephenH
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    Originally posted by wolverine2k3 View Post
    I usually check IMDB for correct aspect ratios. According to that site, Splendor in the Grass has a 1.85:1 aspect ratio. So if the Vudu copy is correct it will probably fill the entire television screen with no bars.

    Hope that helps.
    Widescreen TV is approximately 1.78:1. If the aspect ratio (1.85:1) is shown correctly it will still be letterboxed (black lines on top and bottom).

    Leave a comment:

  • mok77
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    The Invisible Man (1933) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1, correct AR in SD)
    The Mummy (1932) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1, correct AR in SD)
    Sabotuer (1942) (OAR: 1.33:1, Vudu: Stretched to 1.78:1)

    Leave a comment:

  • MoviesPresumably
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    The aspect ratio of Bridget Jones Baby has been fixed. It's streaming in 2:40 to 1 now.

    Leave a comment:

  • QuiGonJ
    replied
    Re: The "Incorrect Aspect Ratio" Thread

    My Friend Flicka.... enhanced widescreen 16:9 when the film was shot as 4:3.

    Leave a comment:

Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 19 34 template Next
Working...
X