Announcement

Collapse

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home Forum Guidelines

The Fandango at Home Forums are designed to help viewers get the most out of their Fandango at Home experience. Here, Fandango at Home customers may post information, questions, ideas, etc. on the subject of Fandango at Home and Fandango at Home -related issues (home theater, entertainment, etc). Although the primary purpose of these forums is to help Fandango at Home customers with questions and/or problems with their Fandango at Home service, there are also off-topic areas available within the Fandango at Home Forums for users to chat with like-minded people, subject to the limitations below.

Please post all comments in English. When posting a comment in the Fandango at Home Forums, please conduct yourself in a respectful and civil manner. While we respect that you may feel strongly about an issue, please leave room for discussion.

Fandango at Home reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party reserves the right to refrain from posting and/or to remove user comments, including comments that contain any of the following:

1. Obscenities, defamatory language, discriminatory language, or other language not suitable for a public forum
2. Email addresses, phone numbers, links to websites, physical addresses or other forms of contact information
3. "Spam" content, references to other products, advertisements, or other offers
4. Spiteful or inflammatory comments about other users or their comments
5. Comments that may potentially violate the DMCA or any other applicable laws
6. Comments that discuss ways to manipulate Fandango at Home products/services, including, but not limited to, reverse engineering, video extraction, and file conversion.

Additionally, please keep in mind that although Fandango at Home retains the right to monitor, edit, and/or remove posts within Fandango at Home Forums, it does not necessarily review every comment. Accordingly, specific questions about Fandango at Home products and services should be directed to Fandango at Home customer service representatives.

Terms of Use - User Comments, Feedback, Reviews, Submissions

For all reviews, comments, feedback, postcards, suggestions, ideas, and other submissions disclosed, submitted or offered to Fandango at Home, on or through this Site, by e-mail or telephone, or otherwise disclosed, submitted or offered in connection you use of this Site (collectively, the "Comments") you grant Fandango at Home a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use the Comments however Fandango at Home desires, including, without limitation, to copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from and/or sell and /or distribute such Comments and/or incorporate such Comments into any form, medium or technology throughout the world.
Fandango at Home will be entitled to use, reproduce, disclose, modify, adapt, create derivative works from, publish, display and distribute any Comments you submit for any purpose whatsoever, without restriction and without compensating you in any way. Fandango at Home is and shall be under no obligation (1) to maintain any Comments in confidence; (2) to pay to users any compensation for any Comments; or (3) to respond to any user Comments. You agree that any Comments submitted by you to the Site will not violate the terms in this Terms of Use or any right of any third party, including without limitation, copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary right(s), and will not cause injury to any person or entity. You further agree that no Comments submitted by you to this Site will be or contain libelous or otherwise unlawful, threatening, abusive or obscene material, or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings or any form of "spam."

You grant Fandango at Home the right to use the name that you submit in connection with any Comments. You agree not to use a false email address, impersonate any person or entity, otherwise mislead as to the origin of any Comments you submit. You are, and shall remain, solely responsible for the content of any Comments you make and you agree to indemnify Fandango at Home for all claims resulting from any Comments you submit. Fandango at Home takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any Comments submitted by you or any third-party.
See more
See less

Some movies lost UV compatibility....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • scottmcasey
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    I also lost my UV copy of There's Something About Mary (still available only through VUDU). I used VUDU's in-home disc-to-digital conversion to purchase from Blu-ray on 6/8 and was presented with the Extended Version. I know it was UV compatible, because it is showing in Flixster as a movie in my collection that is "not yet available for streaming or download on Flixster." However, no version of the movie currently appears in my UVVU account.

    Since the in-home disc-to-digital was released with the 50% promotion, i have converted all available titles in my collection. I currently have over 400 movies and over a dozen TV seasons in my collection. All are UV, with the exception of Meet the Parents (D2D), Oz the Great and Powerful (Disney Copy+), and now There's Something About Mary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by shadow316 View Post
    This is something I didn't even think about when this discussion began and make A LOT of sense. I know the ALID has been changed on movies before (on instance I can think of is with The Notebook.) Flixster and VUDU have had problems between each other in getting the right ALID, and this can affect your UV account. That might be worth bringing up in a support ticket as to whether or not it was changed or perhaps inputted wrong.
    When we change an ALID, it is done for everyone that owns the movie on the service. In the case of The Notebook, we updated it to the correct ALID a long time ago. Some may still have the incorrect ALID on the other side, and would need to contact the company they redeemed the film with.

    With that being said, we're happy to check to make sure we have the correct ALID for a movie, if you're having trouble exporting or importing it. We should be able to tell if the issue is on our side, or theirs.

    Leave a comment:


  • shadow316
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by rdodolak View Post
    That's very possible and if it's the case you would think Vudu would automatically update everyone who previously had the extended edition in their account with the correct ALID. In such case Vudu would have to have known that some people already purchased the extended edition, whether Vudu intended it or not, and that simply changing the ALID for a title would case this problem.

    I've also had titles readded to my purchase history. However one example, in my case, was that I redeemed Les Miserables (1998) through Sony. It showed up on UVVU with HDX rights but when Vudu imported it, it originally showed up in my purchased history as "Les Miserables (SD)" because Vudu only had SD rights at the time. Once Vudu obtain HD rights it was added again to my purchase history as "Les Miserables (HDX)".
    This is something I didn't even think about when this discussion began and make A LOT of sense. I know the ALID has been changed on movies before (on instance I can think of is with The Notebook.) Flixster and VUDU have had problems between each other in getting the right ALID, and this can affect your UV account. That might be worth bringing up in a support ticket as to whether or not it was changed or perhaps inputted wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Speedaddict81
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by Walter-S_North_Carolina View Post
    excuse my ignorance. What is an ALID?
    Basically the individual movie's id number, something I don't think we can see. Vudu and other providers have to ensure that they have the proper ID on their content so it appears correctly on UV...in this case they may have updated the TSAM extended edition ID to one that is not UV-compliant, whereas the theatrical ALID may be UV compliant.

    In other words, the industry equivalent of a UPC.

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter-S_North_Carolina
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    excuse my ignorance. What is an ALID?

    Leave a comment:


  • rdodolak
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    That's very possible and if it's the case you would think Vudu would automatically update everyone who previously had the extended edition in their account with the correct ALID. In such case Vudu would have to have known that some people already purchased the extended edition, whether Vudu intended it or not, and that simply changing the ALID for a title would case this problem.

    I've also had titles readded to my purchase history. However one example, in my case, was that I redeemed Les Miserables (1998) through Sony. It showed up on UVVU with HDX rights but when Vudu imported it, it originally showed up in my purchased history as "Les Miserables (SD)" because Vudu only had SD rights at the time. Once Vudu obtain HD rights it was added again to my purchase history as "Les Miserables (HDX)".

    Leave a comment:


  • echopulse
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Or, it could mean that the ALID was changed. That has happened before. I once did D2D for Night at the Museum. On vudu, it showed Night at the Museum correctly, but on Flixster, and uvvu, it showed Night at the Museum 2, because vudu put the ALID for Night at the Museum 2 in my account. When they changed it to the correct one, Night at the Museum 2 was removed from my uvvu and flixster account, and then Night at the Museum 2 was D2D eligible. Maybe what happened here, was that the ALID for TSAM was changed from the Extended to the Theatrical version. Probably affected everyone. Sometimes, when an ALID is updated, it shows as a new transaction, even though it's not. That explains why some titles rise to the top of your flixster page, even though you added the movie a long time ago. The movies get updated often. So I think it's probably just a mistake. The bottom line though, is you still have the movie, so they didn't shortchange you, you just got a different version than you paid for. I would ask Fox to correct their mistake though.

    Leave a comment:


  • rdodolak
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by Walter-S_North_Carolina View Post
    Ahh, now we are getting somewhere. When fox carpet bombed us with new titles, something went amiss with these two where the extended one loss UV status for some reason.

    Huh. Go figure.

    I don't know about anyone else, but I fail to see justification for abandoning UV/Vudu over this matter. Others may feel differently and I respect that, but I for one am unshaken by such an anomalous fluke. I work in the technology sector and I know good and well stuff like this happens on occasion.
    Agree. However, that doesn't explain why kokomo lost UV rights for that title on UVVU.com or why Vudu gave him a copy of TSAM (theatrical) when he had the extended edition. Since both titles have unique IDs the two titles shouldn't get easily confused.

    If Vudu lost UV rights to the extended edition then kokomo should still maintain UV rights on UVVU.com and even though Vudu may lose UV rights he would still have access to the title on Vudu since he perform the D2D, as I understood, through Vudu. Vudu shouldn't have given him a free copy of the theatrical edition. This is speculation, and not necessarily what happened, but it's almost as if Vudu gave him a copy of the theatrical edition, which is UV, since he lost the UV rights to the extended edition. But that would mean Vudu would know what is going on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter-S_North_Carolina
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by rdodolak View Post
    According to FMBB's list, TSAB (Extended Edition) was added to his list on 3/7/2013 which is when he initially created the list. TSAB (Theatrical) was added to his list on 6/15/2013. The spreadsheet shows both qualified for D2D via either DVD or Blu-ray. However, when searching the D2D list on the Vudu web site TSAB (Extended Edition) is no longer on the list.

    Ahh, now we are getting somewhere. When fox carpet bombed us with new titles, something went amiss with these two where the extended one loss UV status for some reason.

    Huh. Go figure.

    I don't know about anyone else, but I fail to see justification for abandoning UV/Vudu over this matter. Others may feel differently and I respect that, but I for one am unshaken by such an anomalous fluke. I work in the technology sector and I know good and well stuff like this happens on occasion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter-S_North_Carolina
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by kokomo View Post
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/bjh21nml17...rum%20post.jpg from 12-26-2012
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/t0as9s2xt2...0mary%20EE.jpg

    This is not about me I did not start this thread this is about movies being removed from UltraViolet accounts.Many people have reported this has happened to them recently and in the past.

    By the way I have over 200 movies in my UltraViolet account and only 4 on itunes from DVD purchases.

    Personally, I have only had the opposite happen (movies getting added to my UV account from Vudu which were not previously there).

    I have never had one be taken away.

    If it were me, I would go to the mats to find out. In this case, it would be an inquiry to Fox. Seems like you are instead just going to let it stand.

    I had HP-DH#2 in SD via a Flixster redemption. It was showing up in my UV account and Vudu as SD only, but I owned the Bluray disc. I did not feel this was fair and after about ten days of e-mail tennis, I got my copy updated to HDX in Vudu and HD in UV.

    If you feel strongly, I recommend;
    1. Ask Vudu where the 6/17 transaction came from and the details about it.
    2. Ask Fox why the extended addition is no longer a UV title.

    If you do not care to, I will lament the fact you seemingly lost a UV option from one of your Vudu titles with you. I agree, this would not be fair.

    Leave a comment:


  • kokomo
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by echopulse View Post
    Images like that can be faked pretty easily. Concerning Meet the Parents, I remember reading that is was not UV soon after it was added to D2D in January. Here is proof. I guess it could have had it's UV status added, then taken away again, but I don't remember anyone mentioning that it had finally gone UV, and usually someone does.
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/bjh21nml17...rum%20post.jpg from 12-26-2012
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/t0as9s2xt2...0mary%20EE.jpg

    This is not about me I did not start this thread this is about movies being removed from UltraViolet accounts.Many people have reported this has happened to them recently and in the past.

    By the way I have over 200 movies in my UltraViolet account and only 4 on itunes from DVD purchases.

    Leave a comment:


  • rdodolak
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by Walter-S_North_Carolina View Post
    absolutly, I agree too and this matter sould be answered.
    1. Vudu should be able to answer why there is a June 17 transaction
    2. Fox should be able to answer the change in status on this title

    The idea that kokomo is a troller from iTunes forums just trying to undermine UV/Vudu by digitally altering images I suppose can not be ruled out. Our UV High Priest should be able to answer for us if he ever saw this title appear on his hallowed lists subsequent to his weekly communes with the UV gods.

    If not, kokomo can be dismissed as a troller and the presence of such trollers here speaks to the growing threat iTunes loyalist are feeling from UV/Vudu.

    If Mr. FattyMBB did see that title, this is an anomalous blip which would be good to know what happened.
    According to FMBB's list, TSAM (Extended Edition) was added to his list on 3/7/2013 which is when he initially created the list. TSAM (Theatrical) was added to his list on 6/15/2013. The spreadsheet shows both qualified for D2D via either DVD or Blu-ray. However, when searching the D2D list on the Vudu web site TSAM (Extended Edition) is no longer on the list.

    Leave a comment:


  • rdodolak
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by kokomo View Post
    I did not make a transaction (https://www.dropbox.com/s/yvzwclvk5r...out%20Mary.jpg) on that day I already owned There's Something About Mary (Extended Edition) for over one year but that was the day it disappeared from my UltraViolet account.

    I will not ask Vudu to explain because of my past experiences with Vudu customer service.
    So you're saying they converted your extended edition to the theatrical edition. I'm assuming TSAM theatrical went UV somewhere around 6/17. Do you also have a pic showing the original purchase date for the extended edition?

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter-S_North_Carolina
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by Speedaddict81 View Post
    Once added these titles should remain in the UV Collection, the only way they should be removed is if WE, the account holders, delete them, NOT the studios, not the service providers. Once a license is granted (including through D2D of an available title) it is irevokeable.

    absolutly, I agree too and this matter sould be answered.
    1. Vudu should be able to answer why there is a June 17 transaction
    2. Fox should be able to answer the change in status on this title

    The idea that kokomo is a troller from iTunes forums just trying to undermine UV/Vudu by digitally altering images I suppose can not be ruled out. Our UV High Priest should be able to answer for us if he ever saw this title appear on his hallowed lists subsequent to his weekly communes with the UV gods.

    If not, kokomo can be dismissed as a troller and the presence of such trollers here speaks to the growing threat iTunes loyalist are feeling from UV/Vudu.

    If Mr. FattyMBB did see that title, this is an anomalous blip which would be good to know what happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter-S_North_Carolina
    replied
    Re: Some movies lost UV compatibility....

    Originally posted by LuzRinggold View Post
    I don't think that Fox does anything on Vudu's servers, CinemaNow's servers, etc.

    The retailers work with the studios and the retailers should know if our problem is on their end or something caused by a studio's decision. Whatever the problem, the retailers should be able to provide an answer.

    If you are talking about a redemption code that doesn't work, then perhaps you go back to the studio (provided that something on the redemption code tells you who to contact). But when you purchase a UV movie from Vudu, or even purchase UV digital rights using Vudu's D2D service, and later the movie disappears from the UV website, or even "if" it were to disappear from My Vudu, then it's Vudu we need to deal with. This is where the money is exchanging hands and it will be Vudu who will be refunding our money (if it comes down to that).

    Ahh, yes. I see now. It would be a bait-and-switch if a title was bought due to UV compatibility and subsequently the UV capability was removed. I can see how you feel Vudu should be held to account.

    Vudu has this customer's money and as such you are right they should be able to provide an answer. However, they have provided an answer. The answer is pls take the matter up with Fox. Vudu just reflects the UV database.

    If you think the studios do not do anything on the DECE servers, that is a flaw in understanding. Studios interact with DECE via an API. The e-Retailers then reflect this data. It is the studios who populate this data.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X